The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has failed to properly oversee state-run lead paint safety programs, according to a new report by the agency’s independent Office of Inspector General (OIG).
The report found that the EPA has not consistently verified whether state programs meet regulatory requirements or effectively protect public health. Lead-based paint, banned in 1978, remains a major source of lead exposure, particularly for children. About 40% of U.S. housing is estimated to contain lead paint still, posing risks when deteriorating paint chips or dust are inhaled or ingested.
“Without periodic evaluations, the EPA doesn’t have the information it needs to ensure state programs remain protective of human health and the environment,” said Assistant Inspector General Paul Bergstrand. The OIG warned that without stronger oversight, children could face heightened risks of lead poisoning, which can cause organ damage and long-term cognitive impairment.
The investigation reviewed three state-run programs after an anonymous complaint and found the EPA lacked the required data to assess enforcement and compliance. It also identified a failure to create formal procedures for evaluating state programs or withdrawing federal authorization when states fall short.
While childhood lead exposure rates have declined nationally, disparities persist, particularly among children of color and those living in older housing.
The OIG recommended that the EPA direct its regional offices to conduct regular adequacy evaluations and clarify oversight responsibilities. The EPA has agreed to implement corrective actions to address the findings.
Despite decades of progress, the report highlights gaps in the nation’s safeguards against one of the most common sources of lead exposure — a problem that experts say can still have lasting consequences for children and communities.
Source: WHYY