Where Do You Want To Go Today?
ACE announce arts .biz .cal church GC sports contribs COVID-19 elections diversions diversity food .gov health HS sports home kids history obits PA photos podcasts police forum schools science tourism tributes

Lawsuit Challenging Medicaid Abortion Restrictions in Pennsylvania Dismissed

(The Center Square) – A state judge dismissed a lawsuit on Friday that challenged the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s restrictions on Medicaid coverage for abortions.

Commonwealth Court President Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt said the petitioners – including seven reproductive health care centers that provide 95% of abortions across the state – lack standing because she “can ascertain no reason, and none is alleged, why women enrolled in Medical Assistance cannot assert the constitutional claims raised in the petition for review on their own behalf.”

Attorneys for Allegheny Reproductive Health Center, Allentown Women’s Center, Delaware County Women’s Center, Philadelphia Women’s Center, Planned Parenthood Keystone, Planned Parenthood Southeastern Pennsylvania and Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania filed the legal challenge against state officials at the Department of Human Services in January 2019 that claimed Medicaid’s restrictive policies for covering abortions violated their patients’ constitutional rights.

Julio Cortez / AP Photo

Pennsylvania’s Medicaid program only pays for an abortion if it is the result of rape or incest or if it endangers the mother’s life. The reproductive centers said this narrow view left many women to choose between the “essentials of life” or paying for abortion, with many “forced to carry pregnancies to term against their will.”

The centers also complained that the restrictive Medicaid parameters diverted time and resources away from its other programs to help women find ways to afford the procedure.

The state asked for a dismissal based on the centers’ lack of standing – a position with which Leavitt ultimately agreed.

“We conclude that Reproductive Health Centers do not have standing to vindicate the constitutional rights of all women on Medical Assistance, some of whom may not be their patients, and who may or may not agree with the claims asserted on their behalf in the petition for review,” Leavitt wrote. “The interests of Reproductive Health Centers are not inextricably bound up with the equal protection interests of all women enrolled in Medical Assistance.”

House Republican leaders released a joint statement Friday applauding the ruling as “consistent” with their position, as well as state and federal law, that conclude “public funds cannot fund abortions.”

“We applaud the Commonwealth Court for making the right decision and not taking an action to rewrite existing law,” the statement read. “This case was brought forward by Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers who want to make abortions more prevalent in our communities. This ruling in our favor is a victory for all pro-life Pennsylvanians.”

The Center Square reached out to Planned Parenthood Keystone but did not receive an immediate response. The reproductive centers could still choose to appeal the case to the state Supreme Court

+ posts

The Center Square was launched in May 2019 to fulfill the need for high-quality statehouse and statewide news across the United States.

The focus of our work is state- and local-level government and economic reporting. A taxpayer sensibility distinguishes our work from other coverage of state and local issues. As a result of this approach, our readers are better informed about the focus of state and local government and its cost to the citizens whose tax dollars fund governmental decisions.

The Center Square is staffed by editors and reporters with extensive professional journalism experience. We engage readers with essential news, data and analysis – delivered with velocity, frequency and consistency.

We'd value your comment on this post. Please leave one below or send us a note. Comments without a first and last name will not be approved.
>